VS
VersusStack
Automation ✓ Verified 2026-02-26

Zapier vs Make

Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) are the top no-code automation platforms. We compare pricing, complexity, integrations, and real-world performance.

Last updated: 2026-02-26

⚡ Quick Verdict

Zapier dominates in breadth of integrations (7,000+) and simplicity. Make wins on pricing, visual workflow building, and handling complex multi-branch logic. For simple A→B automations, Zapier is faster to set up. For anything with branching, loops, or data transformation, Make is significantly more capable.

Zapier is best for

Non-technical users who need simple automations with maximum app coverage.

Make is best for

Power users and teams who need complex, visual workflows at a lower cost.

Zapier dealbreaker

Zapier gets expensive fast — complex workflows with multiple steps can blow through task limits.

Make dealbreaker

Make's learning curve is steeper, and some niche apps only have Zapier integrations.

Choose Zapier if…

  • →You need the widest possible app integration coverage
  • →Your automations are simple (trigger → 1-3 actions)
  • →You want the fastest setup time with minimal learning
  • →Your team is non-technical and needs a simple interface
  • →You need specific niche app integrations only Zapier has

Choose Make if…

  • →You need complex workflows with branching, loops, and error handling
  • →Budget matters — Make gives you 5-10x more operations per dollar
  • →You want a visual workflow builder that shows data flow clearly
  • →You need to transform and manipulate data between steps
  • →You run high-volume automations (10K+ operations/month)

Get the Free SaaS Stack Cheat Sheet

The top 3 tools in every category — updated monthly. One page, no fluff.

Don't pick Zapier if…

  • ✕You run high-volume automations — Zapier's per-task pricing adds up fast
  • ✕You need complex branching logic or loops in your workflows
  • ✕Budget is a primary concern for your automation stack

Don't pick Make if…

  • ✕You need the absolute simplest automation setup possible
  • ✕You rely on niche apps that only integrate with Zapier
  • ✕Your team has zero technical aptitude and won't invest in learning

Feature Comparison

Ecosystem

FeatureZapierMake
App Integrations7,000+1,800+

Core

FeatureZapierMake
Visual Workflow BuilderLinear step viewFull visual flowchart
Branching LogicPaths (limited)Routers with unlimited branches
Error HandlingBasic retry and alertCustom error routes and fallbacks
Data TransformationFormatter stepsBuilt-in functions and aggregators
SchedulingEvery 1-15 min depending on planEvery 1-15 min depending on plan

Pricing

FeatureZapierMake
Free Tier100 tasks/month1,000 operations/month

UX

FeatureZapierMake
Ease of UseExtremely simple for basicsModerate learning curve

AI

FeatureZapierMake
AI FeaturesAI-powered workflow suggestionsAI assistant for building scenarios

Developer

FeatureZapierMake
WebhooksAvailable on paid plansAvailable on all plans including free

Honest Tradeoffs

Every tool has tradeoffs. Here's what you're actually choosing between.

Pricing

Zapier

$29.99/mo for 750 tasks

Make

$10.59/mo for 10,000 operations

Make is dramatically cheaper at scale. A workflow that costs $100/mo on Zapier might cost $15 on Make.

Integrations

Zapier

7,000+ app integrations

Make

1,800+ app integrations

Zapier's integration library is unmatched, but Make covers all the popular apps.

Complexity Handling

Zapier

Linear workflows, limited branching

Make

Visual builder with branches, loops, error handlers

Make treats workflows as flowcharts; Zapier treats them as linear chains.

Learning Curve

Zapier

15 minutes to first automation

Make

1-2 hours to understand the interface

Zapier's simplicity is genuine — but it becomes a limitation for complex needs.

Pricing

Zapier

$29.99/moPer task per month
Free plan available

Make

$10.59/moPer operations per month
Free plan available

Pros & Cons

Zapier

Pros

  • +7,000+ app integrations — unmatched breadth
  • +Incredibly simple to set up basic automations
  • +Excellent documentation and templates
  • +Built-in AI features for workflow suggestions
  • +Reliable and well-established platform

Cons

  • −Expensive at scale — per-task pricing adds up
  • −Limited branching and conditional logic
  • −No visual workflow builder (linear step view)
  • −Data transformation capabilities are basic
  • −Multi-step zaps require paid plans

Make

Pros

  • +Visual workflow builder shows entire automation flow
  • +Dramatically cheaper than Zapier at any scale
  • +Powerful branching, loops, and error handling
  • +Built-in data transformation and manipulation
  • +Generous free tier (1,000 operations/month)

Cons

  • −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
  • −Fewer integrations (1,800+ vs 7,000+)
  • −Interface can feel overwhelming for beginners
  • −Some advanced features poorly documented
  • −Occasional reliability issues with complex scenarios

What the Data Says

Real numbers, real quotes, real outcomes — not marketing copy.

📊Data Point

Zapier supports 7,000+ app integrations — more than any other automation platform.

Source: Zapier website

📊Data Point

Make's free tier includes 1,000 operations/month vs Zapier's 100 tasks/month.

Source: Make and Zapier pricing pages

💬Quote

I switched from Zapier to Make and cut my automation bill by 80% while building more complex workflows.

Source: r/nocode

Detailed Breakdown

For Simple Automations

Zapier wins

If you need to connect two apps with a straightforward trigger-action pattern — like "new email → create task" — Zapier is hard to beat. The setup takes minutes, the interface is dead simple, and the integration library means your apps are almost certainly supported. Don't overthink it.

For Complex Workflows

Make wins

Make is in a different league for complex automation. Its visual builder lets you create branching logic, loops, error handlers, and data transformations that would be impossible or extremely clunky in Zapier. If your workflow has more than 3 steps or any conditional logic, try Make first.

For Cost-Conscious Teams

Make wins

Make's pricing is dramatically more favorable. The free tier gives you 10x more operations, and paid plans start lower with higher limits. A team running 50,000 operations/month might pay $300+ on Zapier vs $35 on Make. At scale, this difference is massive.

Switching Costs

Already using one? Here's what it takes to switch.

Zapier → Make

Make → Zapier

Neither platform supports direct import from the other. You'll rebuild workflows manually.

FAQ

Is Make really that much cheaper than Zapier? ▾
Yes. Make's operations-based pricing is typically 5-10x cheaper than Zapier's task-based pricing for equivalent workflows. The gap widens as volume increases.
Can Make do everything Zapier can? ▾
Functionally yes — Make can handle any automation pattern Zapier can, and more. The main gap is integration coverage: some niche apps only have Zapier connectors.
What happened to Integromat? ▾
Integromat rebranded to Make in 2022. Same platform, same team, new name and updated interface.
Should I use n8n instead of both? ▾
If you're technical and want self-hosting, n8n is excellent. But for non-technical teams who want managed infrastructure, Zapier or Make are better choices.

Neither feels right?

Consider n8n — n8n is open-source and self-hostable, giving you Make-level power with full data control and no per-operation pricing.

Related Comparisons

Automation

Zapier vs n8n

n8n wins for developers and technical teams — self-host for free, unlimited workflows, custom code nodes, and no per-tas…

Project Management

ClickUp vs Notion

Notion wins for knowledge management, docs, and wikis. ClickUp wins for traditional project management with time trackin…

Project Management

Notion vs ClickUp

Notion is best for teams that think in documents — wikis, knowledge bases, notes, and light project tracking. ClickUp is…

Browse all Automation comparisons →

Ready to choose?

Both tools offer free plans. Try them and see which fits.